• Playlist
  • Seattle Startup Toolkit
  • Portfolio
  • About
  • Job Board
  • Blog
  • Token Talk
  • News
Menu

Ascend.vc

  • Playlist
  • Seattle Startup Toolkit
  • Portfolio
  • About
  • Job Board
  • Blog
  • Token Talk
  • News

Navigating M&A: Insights from Priti Choksi, Partner at Norwest Venture Partners

April 8, 2024

By: Nate Bek

As Partner at Norwest Venture Partners, Priti Choksi is always on the lookout for “white spaces” — opportunities not obvious but hold immense potential.

“If I look at all the seminal moments in my life, it’s never been when someone handed me something and said, ‘go do this,’” she told Ascend in a recent AMA interview. “It's always been, ‘Oh, this seems interesting, I have no idea if it’s going anywhere, but let me spend some time on it and figure that out.’”  

That curiosity and willingness to go above-and-beyond has been a driving force in Priti’s career, from her early days as a tech M&A analyst to her corporate development roles at giants like Google and Facebook.

Priti was a recent guest at Ascend’s AMA, a monthly session for portfolio founders where we bring in experts on relevant topics. She shared insights on scaling, exit strategies, Series A to Series B, and common pitfalls. Keep reading for our main takeaways from that conversation.

Scaling Culture: Google and Facebook’s Founding Strategies

Priti provided a comparison between the early hiring and decision-making cultures of Google and Facebook. Each strategy had trade-offs.

Google

  • Emphasized academic pedigree and decisions came from the top down. 

  • “The advantage is that you have centralized decision makers so you know exactly what’s happening within the organization, and I can pull resources in to actually be effective.”

  • However, this approach sometimes led to slower processes and decision-making.

Facebook

  • Prioritized raw talent and innovation, under Mark Zuckerberg’s leadership.

  • “At Facebook, you manifested a culture that was driven by self-starters that weren’t used to being the best in the classic sense. But they were really talented at something and had something to contribute and something to prove.”

  • This agility fostered rapid growth but was accompanied by its own challenges: “We moved really fast,” Priti says. “But things broke a lot of the time in those early years.” 

Priti highlighted the significant impact of these foundational choices for founders building companies — especially as the company scales and those initial cultural tenants compound. 

“The first 100 people you’re going to hire are likely not going to look like the next 1,000 people,” she says. “But those first 100 people are the ones that are going to hire the next 1,000 people.” 

Positioning for Acquisition: Building Relationships and Crafting a Narrative

For acquisitions, it comes down to the three T’s:

  • Tech — The startup has invested heavily in building its technology, and it’s way ahead of what the acquirer could build on their own leveraging their resources. 

  • Talent — Sometimes it’s truly just about the startup’s talent.

  • Traction — The startup has substantial traction either by way of users, revenue or other key growth metrics.

Priti says savvy acquirers are thesis-driven, as a business might view an acquisition as a means to fulfill a long-term strategic goal: “In the next 3-to-5 years, sometimes 10, we are either going to build, buy or partner for those strategic capabilities.

“If we’re going to build it ourselves, we have a calculus of how much it’s going to cost. If we’re going to partner, we have a strategy on how to do that. But if we’re going to buy, it is likely because it is strategically important to us, but will take us too long to build, and it would be more efficient to acquire.”

The best acquirers make it an efficient process. “They have experience, which means you’re going to be treated well throughout the process. You’re going to have a very clear path to a yes or no, quickly.”

When positioning yourself, Priti says: “Founders should have vision boards — who’s my dream acquirer and what makes them that? Do they allow us to grow faster?” 

Once top targets are identified, the next step is to start partnering, if possible, to get to know the acquirer. Priti says to build those relationships yourself, getting to know the product folks who will ultimately be the sponsor for any acquisition.

For founders, the acquisition process comes down to an alignment of values.

“You need to be able to articulate and understand their vision before you start sharing yours,” Priti says. “What do I need to know about their strategy before I can figure out how I fit into it?... Just slow down to have those conversations.”

Priti points out important questions for both the buying company and the startup to think about before they come together:

  • What will our joint plan for the product look like? How do we define success in the first three months and after one year?

  • What help will the buying company give us to reach these goals? (And what will we give in return?)

  • What can we offer to speed up this plan?

“Those conversations are actually more important than figuring out valuation,” she says.

‘Valley of death:’ Navigating the Series A to B Gap

According to Priti, Series B funding rounds have slowed considerably amid the broader venture market slowdown. This is an important milestone for startups, which Priti refers to as the “valley of death.”

To navigate this critical stage, Choksi advised founders to focus on three key areas:

  1. Product — “Your product needs to be solid and your unit economics need to make sense. It needs to be at a point where, if we didn't do anything else but just put more gas on this, we can actually build a good company.”

  2. Community — “Start building a community around you, with other like-minded founders who are ideally a bit ahead of you, either in your category or space. You can use them as an advisory board.”

  3. Culture — “From an organizational perspective, at that point, start thinking about OKRs, goals, and measurement. Consider how you’re going to measure success against those things.”

Common Pitfalls: Ignoring Feedback and Lacking Grit

Asked about the most common reasons startups fail post-seed, Priti points to two key factors: not listening to customer feedback and poor execution.

“Most of the time, they're not listening to feedback from customers,” she says. “They’re operating in a world where they think they’re Steve Jobs — ‘Oh, I can design a better phone than you actually could ever imagine.’” Customer feedback will tell you how to evolve your product, so listen.

Execution, Priti says, is another common stumbling block. “I think most companies fail because of that… They say they want to do it, but they’re just not capable of whatever the execution requires them to do, or they’re not willing to grind.”

Ultimately, Priti says, it comes down to founder grit and perseverance.

“You guys are a special kind of crazy to go build companies. It takes a very special human to do what you’re doing. It is hard, it is never a straight line. There’s lots of squiggles.”

Tags Priti Choksi, Venture Capital, M&A, Startup M&A

Meet Daniel Paredes: From Seattle Roots to NYC Investor with Sierra Ventures

March 14, 2024

By: Nate Bek

I met Daniel Paredes on a rainy day in Seattle, at a local staple called Paseo. Over Cuban subs, our conversation pretty quickly veered into deal flow and the exciting open-source and deep-tech projects he’s seeing in Seattle and beyond. It’s clear Daniel is not only a go-getter, but he is also passionate about early-stage, the future of technology, and his hometown Seattle.

“Being from the region, I didn’t have a choice, but it’s hard not to be drawn to Seattle,” said Daniel, an investor at Sierra Ventures, currently based in New York. “The most valuable company in the world is based here, and I truly don’t see any other region outside of San Francisco having as much density in terms of AI talent.” 

Daniel graduated from the University of Washington with a degree in finance. After college, he joined Microsoft, where he spent five years in various roles and was most recently a corporate strategy and development manager. Daniel later earned an MBA at Columbia Business School and worked at Madrona Venture Group as an MBA associate. 

Sierra Ventures is an early-stage venture firm investing in enterprise and emerging technologies with investments in Seattle. The firm participated in Seattle-based e-commerce startup Fabric’s seed round in 2020, which is also an Ascend VC portfolio company and has gone on to raise over $290M. 

Daniel was kind enough to sit down with Ascend for our VC profile series, where we showcase early-stage investor friends from across the US. We talked in more depth about his VC passion, Sierra, and his thoughts about his hometown tech ecosystem. Read to the end for carve-outs.

*We’ve edited this conversation for brevity. Enjoy! — Nate 👾

Nate — What made you decide to be a professional investor?

Daniel — I first learned about venture capital in one of the finance classes at the University of Washington. Ever since then, the seed was planted in my head. Everyone has a different path into VC, but I leveraged my MBA to break into the industry after completing several internships.

What did you do before becoming an investor and how does that benefit your founders?

Prior to making the pivot to VC, I spent five years at Microsoft. At Microsoft, I worked across every product group in finance and strategy roles and spent my last year in corporate strategy, where I helped drive the quarterly and monthly reporting for the CEO and board of directors. Overall, the breadth and learning I received at Microsoft and also through my MBA allow me to support founders in anything from product ideation to financial modeling and more.

Why should founders want you on their cap table?

I’m someone who is going to fight side-by-side with my founders. My entire life and career I’ve played the underdog role, so I know what it means to be scrappy and resourceful.

How many new pitches (actual calls/Zooms) do you take per month?

About 50+. Covering NYC and Seattle is tough, but it’s exciting to get to meet so many founders looking to disrupt so many different industries. 

What’s your sweet spot(s) in terms of check size, valuation, and vertical?

We’re currently investing out of our 13th fund ($270 million) and have an early-stage focus on seed and Series A investments. We look at pre-product/pre-rev companies as well. Check size is generally between $1 million to $7 million ($1 million to $3.5 million for seed and $4 million to $6.5 million for Series A). That ramps up to $8 million to $12 million at the strike zone. We also have a preference to lead rounds. We’re geo-agnostic (70% of our deals come outside of the Bay Area) and specialize in enterprise, vertical SaaS and deep tech.

How many new investments do you make per year?

Our goal this year is 12-15 investments.

What initially drew you to the Emerald City? 

Being from the region, it was a must for me to focus on scaling up Sierra’s efforts out here, but it’s hard not to be drawn to Seattle in general. The most valuable company in the world is based in Seattle and I truly don’t see any other region outside of SF having as much density in terms of AI talent. The future continues to be bright for Seattle and I’m glad the rest of the world is starting to realize.

How do you stay informed about emerging markets and industries, particularly outside of Silicon Valley?

The best way to genuinely stay informed is by doing the dirty work. As much as I’d love to say that I read “X amount of reports or articles,” it really comes down to going out and meeting with people in emerging markets or industries. Another investor described it to me as playing in traffic. My favorite thing about this job is that it allows me to learn from so many talented individuals trying to solve some of the world's biggest problems. 

What's your bull case for Seattle/PNW startups? On the flip side, what concerns should the region’s founders and investors keep in mind?

Seattle has some of the most talented and technical founders. What I love is the pure technical talent that I see in founders. On the other hand, I do see technical founders fall short on their GTM strategy, which is driven by customer discovery. Customer discovery is one of the most critical components of company building, as it defines your ICP and guides your GTM as you look to further understand the problem and eventually solve the problem.

What's your take on the key differences in the tech scenes of NYC and Seattle?

Having experienced both ecosystems, it’s hard to compare the two. Seattle thrives on enterprise and solving technical challenges, while New York City brings a variety of industry and founders given the demographic and diversity of industries in NYC. They both are special in different ways and my two favorite cities.

What song is currently getting the most run on your Spotify/Apple Music?

I’m a huge hip-hop head so now that I live in Brooklyn, Jay-Z’s Blueprint album is definitely on repeat. Favorite song off the album would have to be “U Don’t Know.”

Favorite shoes?

The shoe that started it all for me was the Jordan 11. But if I really had to pick, it would probably be the Jordan Bred or Chicago Jordan 1 — you can’t go wrong with a classic.

What's your go-to ingredient in the kitchen, and do you think cooking and investing have anything in common?

My go-to ingredient has to be salt and pepper or caldo de pollo bouillon. I think you need patience for both cooking and investing. Easier said than done — but it’s something I try to practice in both aspects of my life. ☔🔥☔

Tags Seattle, Venture Capital, Daniel Paredes, Sierra Ventures

Seattle VC Firms Led Just 11% of Early-Stage Funding Rounds in 2023

March 11, 2024

By: Nate Bek

If you’re a Seattle startup looking to raise venture capital, odds are most of that money will come from out-of-town investors.

Seattle is home to more than 25 active venture firms with about $2.1 billion in AUM. The ecosystem ranks fifth nationally for early-stage investments and has captured 3% of the nation's pre-seed and seed-on-SAFE dollars since 2020, according to an analysis by Carta’s Peter Walker. On a per capita basis, it ranks sixth among metros, averaging $448 in startup capital invested per person. 

Despite these figures suggesting a strong local funding scene, there’s a hidden dependence on external capital.

The statistics paint a clear image: Out of the roughly $1.6 billion poured into Seattle startups across 162 seed through Series B rounds in 2023, Seattle’s venture firms led or co-led just 18 of those deals, according to data from Crunchbase, analyzed by Ascend. 

A closer look reveals that in 2023, Seattle VCs contributed roughly 12% of the funding from seed to Series B rounds (methodology below). There’s a sharp decline post-seed stage; Seattle VCs accounted for about 25% of seed-stage funding but this plummeted to just 4% at the Series A level.

The issue cuts deeper than numbers. It’s about the ecosystem’s vitality. The recent departure of Techstars Seattle from the region — which cited a lack of venture dollars — was a telling blow. While the city is an AI hub and burgeons with technical talent, local investment is not scaling with startup growth. 

This, in turn, creates a gap. More and more out-of-town investors are eying Seattle’s startups as an investment opportunity. Notably, Point72 and Bonfire have set up shop in Seattle, while investments flowing from the Bay Area is a well-documented phenomenon. (Here’s a deeper look at out-of-town investors that invest in Seattle.)

Local firms are also stepping in to fill the void, especially at the earlier stages. The Alliance of Angels says it’s raising new cash; Breakwater, led by William Finney and Peter Mueller, announced a fresh $10 million fund to buoy Pacific Northwest startups; Seattle-based Breakers, led by Annie Lunchsinger, is backing early-stage startups; and Swizzle Ventures, led by Jessica Kamada, is raising cash. Here at Ascend we’ve backed more than 60 local pre-seed startups across two funds.

Despite this, most startups are expected to think outside of Seattle if they want to fill out their rounds. And they should expect their local angel and pre-seed investors to help make those connections with Silicon Valley funds. 

The ecosystem is not capital-constrained: Seattle is nationally recognized as a vital startup creation engine. With 10 and 11 figure exits becoming a yearly occurrence, the town is a magnet for talent and capital. The best companies and founders do indeed get funded — just, more often than not, by investors from outside the region.

We tracked early-stage funding rounds in Seattle in 2023. Search the index below for deal figures and lead investors.

Methodology: To calculate the total seed through Series B funding involving Seattle VCs in 2023, we analyzed Crunchbase for active Seattle VC firms leading deals. This involved comparing their contributions to the overall deal volume of the period. It's important to note some deals did not specify a lead investor and pre-seed rounds were excluded due to insufficient data in the seed-on-SAFEs category. The Seattle VCs' share of the funding was then determined by dividing the total seed to Series B funding by the deal value from rounds led or co-led by Seattle VCs.

*NOTE: Figures and analysis do not necessarily portray exact data and merely serve as a snapshot of Seattle’s VC landscape. For instance, some rounds that were led or co-led by Seattle VCs included participation from out-of-town investors (and vice-versa).

Tags Venture Capital, Seattle

How the pursuit of exceptional people landed this New York VC in Seattle

February 27, 2024

By: Nate Bek

Antonio “Tono” Osio is all about people. 

The general partner of early-stage venture capital firm ANIMO Ventures made that clear during our conversation last week. My takeaway: human connection and shared values largely define Tono’s investment posture. It’s even baked into his fund’s mantra: “People backing people.” 

Tono’s people-first approach to investment has become a sort of credo — one that gets to the heart of his thesis around early-stage investing. At the core, founder-investor relationships will inevitably be tested during the tumultuous startup journey, so it helps to be on the same page from the jump. 

“Venture, especially at the seed stage, is all about the people,” Tono told me. “That is why we are focused on building the most people-centric firm in the industry.”

Tono’s investment philosophies have largely been shaped by his path into VC. Originally from Mexico, he graduated from the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) with degrees in law and economics. His initial career trajectory spanned corporate law, economic development, and traditional finance before veering into the world of early-stage tech investing. 

Tono developed an interest in the space during his involvement in Mexico’s then-nascent startup ecosystem, where he got involved with a few early-stage companies. 

Working with startups inspired him to pursue a career in venture investing. In 2012 he decided to enroll at MIT, with a focus on VC. While there, Tono worked part-time at New York venture firm FJ Labs. From then on, he decided that VC would become his life’s work. 

Returning to Mexico in 2014, he decided to partner with a close friend and mentor to launch Capital Invent, which he said was one of the first early-stage VC firms in the region. 

A year after launching the fund in Mexico, Tono joined the Kauffman Fellows Program. That’s where he met his friend and eventual fund partner Nico Berardi. The duo discovered a mix of shared values and ideals that eventually drove them to team up and start a new venture firm, ANIMO Ventures. 

Since launching in 2018, the firm has raised two funds, totaling $140 million in AUM. It has 36 portfolio companies, and it’s actively deploying checks at the pre-seed and seed stages across the US with an aggressive generalist approach. (More below on the firm’s funding strategy and details.)

A lot has changed in seed investing during the past years, but Tono thinks that one thing will remain consistent in the coming decades: while sectors and verticals will come and go, people will always remain.

Here’s what ANIMO believes: 

“The only constant will be exceptional people. It is exceptional people that build exceptional companies. It is exceptional people that create and destroy entire markets. Our commitment to backing people is born out of it being the only 30-year strategy, and thus will remain open to any industry or sector; to simply backing exceptional people building wherever their will takes them. It is that will that bends the universe and generates outsized returns.”

This has manifested across the fund’s portfolio. 

Tono pointed to Zócalo Health, a Seattle-based startup with a primary care platform. Founded in 2021 by ex-Amazon Care leaders Erik Cardenas and Mariza Hardin, both of whom are Latino, the startup’s mission is to address the underserved Latino community in healthcare. 

“Erik and Mariza are exceptional founders that have a real founder-market fit story. They really understand the target customers they’re serving — because they are them,” Tono said. The company has raised more than $5 million and recently signed a couple of large business-to-business contracts. “It’s really taking off,” Tono said.

In other words, he invested in the right people. 🚀

Tono was kind enough to sit down with Ascend for our VC profile series, where we showcase early-stage investor friends from across the US. We talked in more depth about his VC passion, Animo, and his bullish views and thoughts about the Seattle tech ecosystem. Read to the end for carve-outs.

*We’ve edited this conversation for brevity. Enjoy! — Nate 👾

Nate: Thanks so much for chatting with us, Antonio. What made you fall in love with VC? 

Tono: I've been in venture capital for more than 12 years. Venture, for me, is a craft with no end — you’re always building and building to try and improve, by continuously raising the bar and never reaching a ceiling. Venture perfectly aligns with my life’s mission, values and goals, and I can’t see myself doing something different. I have realized this is my calling and serving founders is my life’s work. 

It’s also very exciting in the sense that you are learning new things all the time, meeting and learning from exceptional people. Founders that are reimagining industries and re-inventing our future. Being a small part of that is very fulfilling and rewarding.

I love this phrase from Josh Wolfe at Lux Capital that we, as VCs, “like to believe before others understand.” 

Can you go deeper on ANIMO?

We lead pre-seed and seed deals. We are aggressive generalists and invest across the US. Here’s the breakdown: 

  • ANIMO has about $140 million in AUM across two funds. It now has 36 companies in its portfolio. 

  • The firm raised its first fund of $60 million in 2018; it landed $78 million for Fund II in mid 2022, which is the one it is currently deploying out of. 

  • Check sizes range from $500,000 to $2.5 million for startups raising their first $500,000-to-$5 million. 

  • ANIMO is industry agnostic, with a ratio of about 60% enterprise and 40% consumer. 

Sell us on ANIMO. Why should founders want you on their cap table? 

We're striving to create the most people-focused and relationship-driven fund in the industry. We're usually the most active investor on the cap table. We’re very present, we deeply care and we're hustling all the time for our founders. Given that we only do between 7-10 deals a year, we have a very hands-on, white-glove type of approach in the way we work with our founders.

I’m sold! You mentioned earlier that you plan to visit Seattle soon. What draws you here? And what’s your bull case for the region? 

I’ve been going there for a couple years now. What makes the city and region so unique is its talent base. You have some of the largest and most successful tech companies ever based there, so I think that's a magnet and breeding ground for new founders. 

One other thing that I've been pleasantly surprised about is how collaborative and friendly the investor community is in Seattle. I've gotten to know a bunch of the early-stage funds, angels and investors there, and I’ve become close friends with many of them. They’re always really open and willing to help.

It’s always interesting to get an outside view on the ecosystem. I recently chatted with a valley VC about Seattle's big bet on AI/ML. He pointed out that much of our infrastructure and talent pool is riding on it. The VC told me that if AI doesn't take off like we all think it will, we might not be in the best spot. What about you? Any other concerns or thoughts on the local startup ecosystem? 

On the AI front, a concern is the good AI talent from Seattle ends up moving out of the city. If the center of the universe around AI is in the Bay Area, that might attract a lot of the good AI founders out of Seattle.

But I also understand that there's been a lot of work on that front. There’s institutions like the Allen Institute for AI (AI2), as well as a lot of big tech companies investing heavily in the space. The conditions are being created for founders to be able to build their companies and not have to leave. 

The other one, which we’re really excited about, is that we're starting to see more interesting consumer companies coming out of Seattle (i.e. Zocalo), whereas the region has been known more for its enterprise and B2B startups.

Brain drain is always top of mind. But, like you said, there’s so many great people and institutions working to keep that talent in Seattle. Also, I remember reading about Zocalo in GeekWire. I loved Erik and Mariza’s founding story. At the time, I thought it seemed like a rare consumer healthcare play in Seattle. 

Erik and Mariza both have a lot of experience in healthcare, but they also worked at Amazon. I think it's part of that talent you can find in Seattle. There's not that many cities like that, where so much talent works in big tech, along with backgrounds across different industries and company stages.

Let’s pivot to more fun questions… What song is getting the most play on your Spotify/Apple Music? 

There’s an indie rock band from Mexico called Zoé, which has a song named Arrullo De Estrellas which I really like. That’s one. I’m also a big '90s rock fan. Foo Fighters is one of my favorite bands and I love their Seattle origin story. I have seen them live in concert a few times, and they are one of my favorite bands.

That’s more of a personal question to find new music. And, of course, shout out to the Foo Fighters. What’s your favorite pair of shoes? 

I know Kirby’s a big sneakerhead! I’m training for the Boston marathon, which I’ll be running  in a few weeks. Just two days ago, I bought the new Kayano 30 by Asics, and they are my go-to shoe for running. 

Good luck! What’s your go-to ingredient in the kitchen?

I’m from Mexico, so I like spicy food, really spicy food. I would say anything with chiles or salsa. 

Any parting thoughts? 

We gravitate to other investors and founders that are not just exceptional but also just good people — and I think Seattle is full of them. ☔🔥☔

Read More: Mapping the Emerald City’s Growing AI Dominance

Tags Seattle, Venture Capital, ANIMO Ventures

FEATURED

Featured
Subscribe to Token Talk
Subscribe to Token Talk
You Let AI Help Build Your Product. Can You Still Own It?
You Let AI Help Build Your Product. Can You Still Own It?
Startup-Comp (1).jpg
Early-Stage Hiring, Decoded: What 60 Seattle Startups Told Us
Booming: An Inside Look at Seattle's AI Startup Scene
Booming: An Inside Look at Seattle's AI Startup Scene
SEATTLE AI MARKET MAP V2 - EDITED (V4).jpg
Mapping Seattle's Enterprise AI Startups
Our 2025 Predictions: AI, space policy, and hoverboards
Our 2025 Predictions: AI, space policy, and hoverboards
Mapping Seattle's Active Venture Firms
Mapping Seattle's Active Venture Firms
PHOTOS: Founders Bash 2024
PHOTOS: Founders Bash 2024
VC for the rest of us: A big tech employee’s guide to becoming startup advisors
VC for the rest of us: A big tech employee’s guide to becoming startup advisors
Valley VCs.jpg
Event Recap: Valley VCs Love Seattle Startups
VC for the rest of us: The ultimate guide to investing in venture capital funds for tech employees
VC for the rest of us: The ultimate guide to investing in venture capital funds for tech employees
Seattle VC Firms Led Just 11% of Early-Stage Funding Rounds in 2023
Seattle VC Firms Led Just 11% of Early-Stage Funding Rounds in 2023
Seattle AI Market Map (1).jpg
Mapping the Emerald City’s Growing AI Dominance
SaaS 3.0: Why the Software Business Model Will Continue to Thrive in the Age of In-House AI Development
SaaS 3.0: Why the Software Business Model Will Continue to Thrive in the Age of In-House AI Development
3b47f6bc-a54c-4cf3-889d-4a5faa9583e9.png
Best Practices for Requesting Warm Intros From Your Investors
 

Powered by Squarespace